Register    |    Sign In    |   
electronic MUSICIAN

 

 

Mar 10

Written by: masterblogger
3/10/2011 3:33 PM  RssIcon

We have a great feature on mastering coming up in the April EQ! Ken Micallef chats with some really amazing mastering engineers (Gavin Lurssen, Michael Romanowski, Andrew Mendelson, Joe Palmaccio) to learn more about the mastering process, which often seems like a mysterious black art to musicians (and, though they hate to admit it, even some recording engineers)...the guys brought diverse perspectives to the table, but they were unanimous on one point: Mixers need to be confident in their mixes,  finish them...increasingly, mastering engineers are being asked to "fix it in the mix," but mastering engineers aren't magicians; they can only do so much with a stereo master. Don't miss this enlightening feature!

 And in the meantime, check out this "Ask EQ" column from our March issue, to learn about the top mistakes made by first-timers submitting their music for mastering, and how to avoid them like a pro...

In the November 2010 “Ask EQ” column, you mentioned that there are some “rookie errors” in a recording that mastering can’t fix. Could you elaborate?
Shaun McArthur
London, Ontario, Canada
via email

Sure thing, Shaun. Here are the biggest ones. For more, see next month’s in-depth mastering feature, with advice from top pros in the field. Stay tuned! —The Editors

Mixing so “hot” that clipping occurs. It’s difficult at best to undo the results of clipped waveforms. It’s not good enough to make sure that a red clip indicator doesn’t light, because it usually doesn’t take inter-sample distortion into account. Which brings us to . . .

Not leaving some headroom in the mix. Give the mastering engineer room to breathe—treat –6dB as 0. This should also ensure that clipping doesn’t occur.

Strapping processors across the stereo bus and mixing with those processors in place. Processors such as maximizers, exciters, EQs, etc. may make your mix sound better—but so will a mastering engineer, who will likely have better tools to accomplish these functions, as well as the ears and experience to use them optimally. Go ahead and leave those processors on and run a mix for reference, then bypass all stereo bus processors and make a mix (with headroom!) for the mastering engineer. Send the reference along with the real file, and include a note that says, “Please make it sound like the reference, but better.”

Not soloing and listening to each track, from beginning to end, prior to mixing. Many times, a mastering engineer will pick up on clicks, pops, distortion, etc. that were overlooked during the mixing process. Listening to each track individually before mixing can spotlight those errors before they get “baked” into the mix.

Mixing in a room with bad acoustics. This guarantees that your mix won’t be accurate. For example, if you don’t have some kind of bass treatment, then there will usually be nulls at bass frequencies, causing you to mix the bass louder than it should be. Mastering can compensate for this to some extent, but not always. (See our back page for tips on optimizing your room.)

Forgetting that mastering is not mixing. Mastering affects all sounds at once. If the vocal is weak in the mix and mastering uses EQ to help bring it out, those changes will affect all other instruments in the same frequency range. Get the mix right before it goes off for mastering!

Ask EQ a technical audio-related question, and EQ will answer it. Send it to EQeditor@musicplayer.com.

 


Tags:
Categories:
Alert to All Users of the Disqus commenting system:
Because of a recent global security issue, the Disqus website recommends that all users change their Disqus passwords. Here's a URL about the issue: http://engineering.disqus.com/2014/04/10/heartbleed.html
comments powered by Disqus

Recent_Entries

Premastering Pitfalls
Paying Tribute to a Studio Legend
The Epic Music of Grand Theft Auto V
NAMM 2014: It's a wrap!
NAMM Day Three Highlights
most popular
Connect with EM
Free eNewsletter
the em poll