How To EQ Without An EQ - EMusician

How To EQ Without An EQ

It’s staggering how many equalizers are on the market these days — both hardware and software. Some are very clinical and are best for doing surgery on badly recorded tracks. Many sound quite musical, and impart a pleasing character of their own. But it’s nice to be able to use an EQ by choice rather than out of necessity, or even not have to use one at all. Too often engineers rely on EQ to shape a track’s tone when there are other ways to achieve the same (or better) results, and although EQ on a few tracks can sound pleasant, when added up across a lot of tracks, a mix may start to sound unnatural and over-processed — or even harsh, depending on the quality of the EQ. Some people like that sort of thing, but if you’re looking for a more live, natural, in-your-face kind of sound, it’s best to nail the tone you want before you even get to the mix stage.
Publish date:

As you’ve probably guessed, the place to start is the sound of the instrument itself. If that doesn’t sound the way you want it, it’s going to be awfully hard to convince it to sound that way later with lots of EQ. But for the purposes of this article, we’ll assume you know that, and you have your instruments dialed in the way you want them. We’ll also assume that it’s obvious your mic selection will influence the sound of the track, as will the use of high pass filters built into many mics themselves (technically still an equalizer). But aside from all that, here are some additional ways to shape your sound without EQ.

Use the mic’s pickup pattern to your advantage. Often, placing a mic off axis to the instrument sounds better than dead on. Rather than point a mic straight at a speaker cone on a guitar amp, for example, try angling the mic a bit so it points slightly away from the speaker. You’ll often find there’s less mud that way, and the track sits better in a mix with bass and drums.

Make good use of bass proximity. A mic in any pickup pattern other than omnidirectional will have a bass bump as you move close to it, while the low end will start to drop off as you move it farther away from the source. Want more low end? Move the mic closer to the source. Do the reverse for less low end.

Take advantage of comb filters. Whenever you have two or more mics on one source, the signals and the reflections hitting the two mics will combine with each other and cause some frequencies to be cancelled or attenuated and others to be amplified — an effect known as a comb filter. You can’t get rid of comb filtering entirely; whenever you combine an original sound source with its reflections, or two different miked signals, comb filtering is inevitable. The question is, does the effect sound good or bad? Placing the mics in the “wrong” spot relative to each other may result in a lot of cancelled fundamental frequencies, producing a thin, incoherent sound. A comb filter that amplifies the instrument’s fundamentals, on the other hand, will create a more powerful and cohesive sound.

Normally you look for the “sweet spot” when using multiple mics — the spot where each mic sounds good on its own, and the combination is phase coherent and sounds solid. But sometimes, you actually want to create a thinner, weaker sound if the instrument is meant to be a background pad or ambient coloration. I’ve often used this technique to make an organ track seem to float on top of a mix, for example — organ can be overbearing at times and seem to hog the whole mix, but using two mics on it and placing them so there’s a bit of phase cancellation can give it a spacious, ethereal quality that sits very nicely in the mix.

Or you may want to bring out certain overtones in the instrument by creating a comb filter that amplifies those overtones. It’s not necessary to do a lot of math and figure out the exact distance the mics must be from one another to achieve this (although you could). Simply use your ears and move the mics around while listening, and note the tonal differences that happen as you move each mic around in relation to the other(s).

The “25 cent EQ” for acoustic guitar. Does your close-miked acoustic guitar sound too muddy or boomy? Have the guitarist use a thin pick when recording. It’ll brighten the tone considerably.

Change the room’s tonal characteristics. Hang blankets or carpeting on the walls to kill the high end in the room, or put a plywood “floor” in a carpeted room to create more early reflections, which will change the tone considerably. Use baffles to create more reflections or less, depending what you use for the surface of the baffle and how far you place it from the instruments and mics. Even varying the humidity in the room will change its sound.

It can be a very educational challenge to try to do a recording that requires no EQ at all in the mix. Even if you don’t succeed entirely, you’ll learn a lot about listening to the source while tracking and the different ways mic placement, room characteristics, and other factors affect the end result. And you may just stumble into some great sounds in the process!

Lee Flier is a guitarist, songwriter, engineer, and producer based in Atlanta,Georgia. Her band, What The…?, is a fixture in the Atlanta area, has released two independent CDs, and of late has been performing in other states and countries. She can be contacted via the band’s website at, and also moderates the “Backstage With the Band” forum at